Russians love Putin's dustup with the West. But they've stopped spending money
Why rival discounters are vying for control of Family Dollar Stores
Twitter's head of product, Daniel Graf, must make the service more user-friendly without offending hard-core fans
Yale's Robert Shiller is sending up warning flares. It may be best to ignore him
To minimize flood chaos, turn the hospital upside down
Bayer is marketing Berocca as performance drink, but Australians know what it's really for
Testimony from one selective-college grad who's working as a cashier: "I’m depressed [laughter]."
Advice for a small bed-and-breakfast trying to get on the map for international tourists
When ranking the value of the Best Global Brands, Interbrand evaluates brand value in the same way any other corporate asset is valued -- on the basis of how much it is likely to earn for the company in the future. Interbrand uses a combination of analysts’ projections, company financial documents, and its own qualitative and quantitative analysis to arrive at a net present value of those earnings. The brand values are based on data collected during the 12 months prior to June 30, 2008. This means that more recent developments, including the troubles at Merrill Lynch and AIG, are not factored into the brand valuations.
Data: Interbrand, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, BusinessWeek
Business Exchange related topics: