
Washington fears that the growing dispute between China and Europe over solar equipment could set off a global trade war

After eight years of tinkering, Microsoft launches XBox One in hopes it will play a central role in American home entertainment

The Obama administration fails to come clean about a flawed federal program that dated back to the Bush administration. There's a pattern here

The online retail giant suffered a $338 million loss abroad last year

One year after the IPO, questions remain about the company's ability to target mobile users

Like Steve Jobs's 2005 Stanford speech, some commencement addresses have the power to linger in the popular consciousness

The ins and outs of wearing fluorescent trousers

Darden Dean Robert Bruner tells MBA graduates they should stay with their first post-graduation employer long enough to make a difference

Seven tips for small businesses competing with corporate recruiters for the most talented grads
getty images
When ranking the value of the Best Global Brands, Interbrand evaluates brand value in the same way any other corporate asset is valued -- on the basis of how much it is likely to earn for the company in the future. Interbrand uses a combination of analysts’ projections, company financial documents, and its own qualitative and quantitative analysis to arrive at a net present value of those earnings. The brand values are based on data collected during the 12 months prior to June 30, 2008. This means that more recent developments, including the troubles at Merrill Lynch and AIG, are not factored into the brand valuations.
Data: Interbrand, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, BusinessWeek
Business Exchange related topics:
Brand Marketing
Brand Identity
Branding