During the past 20 years, the author has watch China move from being a developing country into an industrial superpower
Money Moves, 5/24: Chocomize Co-Founder Fabian Kaempfer talks with Bloomberg’s Deirdre Bolton about the business of customizing chocolate
The president's campaign has a new rule—no cell phones allowed
In honor of remote control inventor Eugene Polley, we recognize other influential but neglected inventors who have felt the sting of stolen glory
Forget Adderall. Traders now pop chia seeds to stay focused and energized
The Italian automaker and others are adding hybrid technology to elite cars
The storied bridge that links San Francisco and Marin County changed the face of California
Schools cultivate ties with startups before they're big successes
Dave McClure's traveling venture capital show scours the world for promising startups
Bloomberg
By Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Alexis Leondis
Graef Crystal, a pioneer in compensation consulting, analyzed the 2009 pay of 271 chief executive officers for Bloomberg News. His findings? “Simply put,” Crystal says, “companies don’t pay for performance.”
Although there is no standard method for analyzing compensation, Crystal, 76, developed the formulas he uses over the course of 30 years advising companies on their pay practices. In an ideal world, Crystal and many investors agree, stock performance and CEO pay would be closely aligned. But Crystal discovered no relationship between shareholder returns and CEO compensation*. Here is a look at the 10 executives paid the most and the 10 paid the least. For the complete list, along with an explanation of the methodology used by Crystal, click here.
*All pay figures are in millions of dollars